Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Cox vs Tristan Schoolkate Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cox vs Schoolkate analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Cox vs Tristan Schoolkate Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cox 1 - 0 Schoolkate
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cox has won 48.84% of points on their second serve, while Schoolkate has won 51.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cox, in recent form, has won 53.55% of their opponent's second serve points, while Schoolkate has won 47.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.21% and 28.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cox has saved 47.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schoolkate has saved 56.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cox has won 57.41% of matches played (W/L 31/ 23), with Schoolkate winning 57.14% (W/L 40/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cox has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 235/ 117), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 26/ 30). Schoolkate has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 75% (W/L 15/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 24/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Cox has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 22/ 12), where as Schoolkate has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.35% of matches (W/L 39/ 29). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cox winning 1 times and Schoolkate being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cox winning 2 and Schoolkate winning 0. The last match between Cox and Schoolkate was at the M25 Nottingham, 05-08-2022, Semifinals, Grass with Daniel Cox getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cox and Schoolkate have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cox winning 0 times and Schoolkate 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Cox winning 1, and Schoolkate 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cox has played against opponents with an average rank of 189.61 while Schoolkate has played against players with an average rank of 248.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cox has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schoolkate has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cox has converted 38.06% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schoolkate has converted 35.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
564
Rank
206
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
186
Rank
186
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
61% (436-284)
Career Total W/L
59% (145-101)
67% (12-6)
YTD W/L
61% (20-13)
$37,845
Career Prize Money
$65,000
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cox VS Schoolkate H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Daniel Cox | Tristan Schoolkate |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:0 | 1:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (46/71) | 58% (32/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (31/46) | 63% (20/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (14/25) | 43% (10/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (25/55) | 37% (26/71) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Cox VS Schoolkate H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniel Cox
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Cox | Tristan Schoolkate |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (12/6) | 61% (20/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (24/13) | 56% (42/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (187/149) | 52% (377/349) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 65% (20/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.76 |
| Aces Total | 64 | 268 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 117 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:14 | 1:39:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 81.17 | 263.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (673/1019) | 57% (1257/2206) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (488/673) | 77% (971/1257) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (169/346) | 51% (485/949) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (51/134) | 35% (69/195) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (455/1087) | 36% (825/2275) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 61% (19/12) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (12/18) | 61% (20/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 71% (10/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 29% (17/5) |
Daniel Cox Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Daniel Cox
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
101)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Cox
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Daniel Cox
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Jerome Kym
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Leonardo Rossi
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
0-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Daniel Cox
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Hynek Barton
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tristan Schoolkate Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Yi Zhou
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Adam Walton
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Maxime Cressy
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
8
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
58%
(
66 of
114)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
11
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
3
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Mattia Bellucci
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Denis Yevseyev
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
46
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
9
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Alex Bolt
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve %
56%
(
15 of
27)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
6 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
38
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Cox Vs Schoolkate Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
